ARE S2S,IPIP, GPI, Alliance Lit2, DTC, EUROCLEAR, etc TRANSACTIONS MONEY LAUNDERING?
Whistleblowers.info's website strongly suggests that ALL various transactions are an act of "sophisticated money laundering". Whistleblower's also states that any intermediary(s) listing their names on one of the typically clueless fee agreements circulating the Internet are automatically admitting to their participation in the act of money laundering... which actually might be true since both intermediaries as well as those labeling themselves a "principals" typically don't clearly think about the real processes, liabilities, and/or the compliance of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations that are actually involved within these type of transactions.
Notice that most of the fake or without support contracts that float on Internet say that the transactions are for "the purpose of project funding" but regularly have any real/credible projects intelligently and professionally integrated within the paperwork the brokers.
And all that EXACT drama/liability is the EXACT reason why our Group will INTENSELY FOCUS on the authenticity, history, documentation, as well as short and long-term goals of ALL parties involved within these transactions in order to not waste time nor cause legal liability exposures towards itself in any illegal activity liabilities.
ARE THESE TYPES OF TRANSACTIONS LEGITIMATE?
It stands to reason that anything legitimate in these transactions, depending on its legal correct information will be completely tracked/traced/documented/ etc , by Interpol, FBI, Homeland Security, ASIC, ICE, etc as well as will also have to be blessed by the central banks so it's absolutely critical that all parties conduct themselves in an advanced highly-wise manner.
• What verifiable facts support the sender being real, clean, and have the relationships/controls as advertised?
• What verifiable facts support the receiver being real, clean, and have the relationships/controls as advertised?
• What verifiable facts support the project(s) being real, clean, and have the relationships/controls as advertised?
• What verifiable facts support the intermediaries being real, clean, and have the relationships/controls as advertised?
• What legal documentation representation is involved?
• What verifiable accounting involved?
LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND AUDITING
The key to preventing the banks, central banks, regulators, and/or other authorities from denying a transaction and/or classifying a transaction as money laundering is having proper financial andlegal team representation and external auditing involved with the transfer transactions as well as the associated project funding.
The role of the attorneys/advocates/barristers/solicitors/legal/finance expert/economist representatives are to verify and attest to the authenticity of the client, the asset, the custody of the asset, as well as the client's banking relationships. Don't expect the World's top banks, accounting, and law firms to engage with parties with less than credible accounting and law firms. All parties financial team, accounting and lawyers will be expected to have reazonable professional accounts like real/competent economist, financecexpert, accounting and legal professionals that are capable of interacting with multi-million/billion-dollar/euros/sterling pounds/yuan/yen transactions.
If you think these calibers of transactions don't need highly-competent professional team involved... to perform, then you are wrong and our recomendation is don't touch it as the way to remain out of problems.
SENDING ACCOUNTS
One of the main problems with many of the sending accounts is that the sender does not have proper projects to package with the transactions for the banks and central banks to approve moving the off-ledger funds into the public domain.
All the contracts that float on Internet say the transaction is for "the purpose of project funding" without concrete reference and registration in the contract.
That said... it stands to reason that credible projects need to be fully integrated/packaged with these transactions. Some senders that say no project details need to be included will be categorized as either having a goal of money laundering and/or clueless.
Credible senders that have no credible projects need to understand that these transactions require alwaysc fully-integrated with credible humanitarian and productive projects
RECEIVING ACCOUNTS
In the past a number of parties have approached us asking us to assist with helping them establish receiving accounts to participate within these transactions in base our humanitarian projects in more 170 countries and our team of experts in this subjects. Having a depository bank account and registered humanitarian projects is the easy part of these transactions. The critical/real part of these transactions is actually establishing the proper (high) levels of banking relationships that have real access to the screens that enable these transactions to be synchronized with the properly managed/audited projects that allow the banks and central banks to approve these type of transactions.
HUMANITARIAN PROJECTS
The correct understanding that the approval of these interbank transactions requires humanitarian projects to be synchronized within the transactions.
INTERMEDIARIES AND FACILITATOR'S
The most frequently mistake from intermediaries/facilitators had been think they have no accountability within these transactions but that is wrong. If intermediaries expect to get paid within these transactions, the intermediaries need to be fully accountable for their own authenticity and legal status also. The compliance officers and accounting firms are going to make sure that the intermediaries also don't have any background that might contaminate/incriminate the legitimacy of these kinds of transactions.
TRUST
Credibility is the key issue with these transactions.
SPECIAL NOTES
• We has received an absolutely overwhelming quantity of offers/requests for various "Server to Server" (S2S) IPIP, GPI, ALLIANCE LITE2. DTC, EUROCLEAR services from both sending and receiving sides for these types of transactions. • The principals and banks must need direct communication with each other. Contracts designed by brokers and/or corrupt principals that say there will be no communication between principals and/or banks will be immediately kicked to the garbage.• Just passing Word docs around the Internet like typical Internet intermediaries/brokers guarantees nothing will close. • Intermediaries must be pre-organized and packaged so there are no issues in regards to who is involved and knowing that it is an easily closable/payable deal in the middle.• Intermediaries themselves must have clean backgrounds so that suspicions cannot be raised that the commissions will possibly be used for illegal activities.• Any parties expecting closing in 72 hours might easily be considered as either fraudulent, inexperienced, ignorant of the processes, a money launderer, and/or using stolen funds.• Some of the names of senders and receivers as well as various documents, passports, et cetera, have been seen dozens of times over the last several years.ALPHA CENTAURUSCEDUCATIONAL SERVICES, BRIGHT WORLD CORPORATION, GLORY TOP LTD, ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN THESE TRANSACTIONS WITHOUT FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE SENDER AUTHENTICITY, SKILLSETS, AND EXPECTATIONS OF ALL PARTIES.Sent from my Huawei Mate XS phone
Glory Top International Investment&Leasing
